Lee Chang-dong Was Away Eight Years, Not Sixteen, and Burning Was Never Nominated
Lee Chang-dong came back to Venice after eight years and took the Grand Jury Prize. Half the coverage says sixteen years, and the Oscar claim attached to his last film has been wrong since 2019.
Lee Chang-dong's Possible Love took the Silver Lion — Grand Jury Prize at Venice on 12 September, finishing second to Woman Unknown in a competition he had not entered in nearly a decade.
It is the more durable story of the two. A surprise Golden Lion is a story about one night; a Lee Chang-dong film is a story about the next three years of the international circuit. And almost every piece written about it so far contains at least one of two errors.
Eight years, not sixteen
The gap keeps getting misstated, and the mistake has a consistent shape: writers date the return from Poetry in 2010, producing a sixteen-year absence, because they have skipped Burning entirely.
Burning came out in 2018. The gap is eight years. It only becomes sixteen if you forget the film that made him internationally famous to a generation that had not seen Secret Sunshine, which is a strange thing to forget.
Eight years is still a long time — long enough that the industry Possible Love arrives into has completely reorganised around Korean cinema since his last film. It just is not sixteen.
Burning was shortlisted. It was not nominated.
This is the bigger one, and it has been circulating uncorrected since 2019.
Burning made the Academy's nine-title shortlist for Best Foreign Language Film — the first Korean film ever to do so, which is a genuine and citable first. It then did not make the final five.
"The first Korean film nominated for an Oscar" is the inverted version, and it is everywhere. The first Korean nomination, and the first win, both belong to Parasite a year later — which is precisely why the distinction matters. Collapsing shortlist into nomination erases the thing that made Parasite remarkable.
If a piece this week tells you Lee has an Oscar nomination, it is describing an event that did not happen.
Get the award's name right, because three of them sound alike
Venice hands out two Silver Lions and they are not interchangeable, which is how the wire lists ended up in the state they are in this week:
- Silver Lion — Grand Jury Prize: Lee Chang-dong, Possible Love. This is the one he won
- Silver Lion for Best Direction: Ilya Khrzhanovsky, DAU. A different award, a different film
- Orizzonti Best Director: Jacqueline Lentzou. A different competition entirely
Describing the Grand Jury Prize as "runner-up to the Golden Lion" is loose but not fatal. Describing it as a Best Director award is simply the wrong trophy.
What a second-place Venice prize is actually worth
Here is the thing worth saying plainly, ahead of the awards-season pieces that will start appearing next week. The Golden Lion is a weaker Oscar predictor than its reputation suggests. Recent winners have repeatedly taken the Lion and then lost Best Picture, and several have missed a Best Picture nomination altogether.
What Venice reliably does is not crown the winner. It is a launch platform — the premiere slot and the review embargo matter more to a film's next twelve months than the metal does. A Grand Jury Prize for a director with Lee's standing buys him distribution conversations in every territory that matters, and that is the mechanism, not the trophy.
Which is a useful frame for the whole week. Woman Unknown got the headline. Possible Love got a director with four decades of standing, a prize that will appear in every poster and press note from here on, and eight years of accumulated anticipation released at once in front of the international press.
Second place at Venice, for the right filmmaker, is not obviously worse than first.