The Lord of the Rings Film Omitted a Key Moment That Redefined Frodo’s Heroism

Peter Jackson’s adaptation of The Lord of the Rings is celebrated for its epic scale and emotional depth, but it’s no secret that the films took creative liberties with J.R.R. Tolkien’s original narrative. Among the most significant omissions is a scene that would have cast Frodo Baggins in a far more compelling light, highlighting qualities that even Samwise Gamgee couldn’t match.

In the cinematic version, Frodo steps forward at the Council of Elrond, volunteering to carry the Ring into Mordor. Yet, in Tolkien’s book, it’s actually Bilbo who first offers to take on the burden, only to be gently turned down due to his age. Frodo’s eventual decision is met with a sense of inevitability—Elrond makes it clear that if Frodo cannot succeed, no one can. This subtle but powerful moment, largely glossed over in the film, sets the stage for Frodo’s unique journey and the weight he carries.

What truly sets Frodo apart, though, is not just his willingness to accept the quest, but his capacity for mercy—a trait that becomes central to the fate of Middle-earth. While Sam is often portrayed as the steadfast companion, ready to do whatever it takes to protect Frodo, he is also quick to distrust and even threaten Gollum. Frodo, on the other hand, repeatedly chooses compassion, sparing Gollum’s life time and again, even when it seems unwise.

This mercy is not just a character quirk; it’s the linchpin of the entire saga. Frodo’s refusal to destroy the Ring at Mount Doom is often seen as a failure, but it’s Gollum’s survival—thanks to Frodo’s earlier acts of kindness—that ultimately leads to the Ring’s destruction. Without Gollum, the quest would have ended in disaster. Frodo’s empathy, often mistaken for weakness, proves to be his greatest strength.

Throughout their perilous journey, Sam’s suspicion of Gollum never wavers. He is prepared to end Gollum’s life on several occasions, convinced that the creature’s treachery will doom them all. Frodo, however, sees something different—a glimmer of hope, perhaps, or a reflection of what the Ring could do to anyone. By sparing Gollum, Frodo ensures that the final act of the quest is possible, even if it comes at great personal cost.

In the mines of Moria, Frodo questions Gandalf about Bilbo’s decision to spare Gollum years earlier. The answer he receives is simple yet profound: mercy can have far-reaching consequences. This lesson echoes throughout the story, culminating in the climactic struggle at Mount Doom. Had Sam succeeded in killing Gollum, the Ring would have remained out of reach, and darkness would have prevailed.

Frodo’s journey is not one of flawless heroism. He stumbles, he falters, and in the end, he cannot bring himself to destroy the Ring. But it is precisely this vulnerability, coupled with his compassion, that makes him a true hero. Tolkien’s message is clear: sometimes, the greatest victories come not from strength or cunning, but from the simple act of showing mercy, even to those who seem beyond redemption.

As the credits roll and the story draws to a close, viewers are left to ponder the true nature of heroism. Frodo’s legacy is not defined by his triumphs, but by his choices—the moments when he chose understanding over vengeance, and kindness over cruelty. In omitting this crucial scene, the film misses an opportunity to fully explore the depth of Frodo’s character and the profound impact of his actions.

So, was Gollum worthy of the mercy shown by Bilbo and Frodo? That’s a question that lingers long after the final frame, inviting us to reflect on the power of compassion in our own lives.

#LordoftheRings #FrodoBaggins #PeterJackson #Gollum